The Great Global Warming Blunder: How Mother Nature Fooled the World’s Top Climate Scientists
| Author | : | |
| Rating | : | 4.74 (670 Votes) |
| Asin | : | 1594036020 |
| Format Type | : | paperback |
| Number of Pages | : | 216 Pages |
| Publish Date | : | 2016-09-19 |
| Language | : | English |
DESCRIPTION:
Spencer is a Principal Research Scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville. He has provided congressional testimony several times on the subject of global warming and authored the 2008 New York Times bestseller, Climate Confusion.. He is co-developer of the original satellite method for precise monitoring of global temperatures from Earth-orbiting satellites. Roy W. He was forme
More carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is not necessarily to be feared; The Great Global Warming Blunder explains that burning of fossil fuels may actually be beneficial for life on Earth.As group-think behavior and misguided global warming policy proposals threaten the lives of millions of the world’s poorest, most vulnerable citizens, The Great Global Warming Blunder is a scintillating exposé and much-needed call for debate.. The Great Global Warming Blunder unveils new evidence from major scientific findings that explode the conventional wisdom on climate change and reshape the global warming debate as we know it. Spencer, a former senior NASA climatologist, reveals how climate
About the AuthorRoy W. He is co-developer of the original satellite method for precise monitoring of global temperatures from Earth-orbiting satellites. He was formerly a Senior Scientist for Climate Studies at NASA. Spencer is a Principal Research Scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville. He has provided congressional testimony several times on the subject of global warming and authored the 2008 New York Times bestseller, Climate Confusion.
D. Cavan said Feedback Is The Critical Issue in Greenhouse Warming. This was a fascinating read for me. I am a PhD chemist who is no expert in climatology but I read as much as I can find on this topic. I know that the CO"Feedback Is The Critical Issue in Greenhouse Warming" according to D. Cavan. This was a fascinating read for me. I am a PhD chemist who is no expert in climatology but I read as much as I can find on this topic. I know that the CO2 greenhouse effect is real. My interest is in the feedback loops in climate systems, since this determines the magnitude of the ultimate effects of greenhouse warming, and clouds are the major feedb. greenhouse effect is real. My interest is in the feedback loops in climate systems, since this determines the magnitude of the ultimate effects of greenhouse warming, and clouds are the major feedb. dzagar said An interesting contratian view. I like what I have read from Roy Spencer. Both Spencer and Lindzen are doubters when it comes to the IPCC projection of 1.5 to 6 degree C heating, and both imply that clouds could have a big effect on the picture. Spencer points out that most IPCC models predict clouds aggrevate heating from increased carbon dioxide in the air, or in his terminology,. Recommended for all of who believe CO2 created warming is fact! R. Hirsch Global climate science is much more complex than the CO2 crowd would have you believe. There are 22 significant variables and CO2 is only one of the 22. When I see an account that takes into account all 22 and still comes to the conclusion that CO2 is the culprit, then I will be on board. Until then we are looking at "junk science" promoted by the me